Did you just receive a refusal on your trademark application for being Merely Descriptive?
Been Refused? See Why Should I Have A Trademark Attorney Answer My Office Action if you have already applied and been refused. There may be responses that may save your trademark from going abandoned.
Answering Office Actions
Why not just read a textbook or blog in order to find out the answer to a trademark refusal? General purpose answers on how to answer office actions are not geared to specific trademarks issues. Each registration of a mark is specific to the facts involved. The most common refusals are for a likelihood of confusion with a prior pending or registered mark or descriptiveness refusals (merely descriptive or generic).
Not every office action has an answer that will save the application, some proposed trademark applications just do not comply with U.S. Trademark Law. Once a trademark application is submitted the changes or amendments that can be made are very limited. Sometimes a particular trademark could gain registration if the application had been done right and the only fix would be to start over. If we review your application and believe that the mark as submitted cannot be saved, we will offer you a discounted price on applying for a new registration where we can tailor your application to avoid the refusals and issue quickly.
Need an affidavit of acquired distinctiveness? We have a large number of affidavits (our own and others) that have been successful in obtaining a Section 2(f) or 2(f) in part claim. Unfortunately someone else’s claim can only be used as an example of how to prove acquired distinctiveness under a certain set of facts but there are similarities for different types of fact patterns that can improve the chances of success. There are also a number of different fact dependent strategies for how and when to submit evidence (with the application or only if the examiner requires it?). The more highly descriptive the matter is, the more difficult it is to show acquired distinctiveness.
If your trademark has value and you want to use our experience in trademark law to
your advantage, call us at (651) 500-
Why is Avoiding A Merely Descriptive Trademark Important?
Merely Descriptive matter is not registerable on the Principal Register without a showing of acquired distinctiveness (red arrow in illustration below). Even with a valid claim of acquired distinctiveness, a descriptive trademark may still be considered weak and given a narrow scope of protection under the law.
Why is a narrow scope of protection bad?
Distinctiveness is the measure of the inherent strength of a mark (is it a weak or
strong trademark?). An inherently distinctive trademark [as opposed to a descriptive
or generic trademark] is a strong trademark. An inherently distinctive trademark
may be registered on the USPTO Trademark Principal Register, qualifies for more protection
under more federal, state and common law and is stronger for use in business to promote
authenticity and for expanding product lines. The stronger the trademark the greater
protection received from the courts. Nike, Inc. v. Just Did It Enterprises, 6 F.3d
at 1231 (C.A.7 (Ill.), 1993) quoting Squirtco v. Seven-
What is not a Strong Trademark? (What is a Weak Mark?)
If a trademark is not inherently distinctive, such as a mark that is merely descriptive or generic, it is hard to protect from competitive use and may be a weak mark or have no rights at all! The law does not allow trademark owners to take descriptive dictionary words and claim them for exclusive use (including geographically descriptive marks). See Examples of Strong Marks and Weak Marks.
The date when a business obtains common law rights in a trademark (“trade identity rights’) depends on the distinctiveness of the mark. “A business will obtain rights in the mark upon first use only if the mark is inherently distinctive. If the mark is not inherently distinctive, a business may obtain ownership rights in the mark when the mark attains a secondary meaning.” Coach House Restaurant, Inc. v. Coach and Six Restaurants, Inc., 934 F.2d at 1559 (C.A.11 (Ga.), 1991). Even if someone uses something as a trademark, “if it is not distinctive, the user does not have a trademark because he has no existing trademark rights.” Otto Roth & Company, Inc. v. Universal Foods Corporation, 640 F.2d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 1981).
At best, a merely descriptive trademark may only potentially be registered on either the USPTO Federal Principal Register after 5 years of acquired distinctiveness (has achieved a secondary meaning) with the proper evidence or on the Supplemental Register. See Comparison for the advantages of federal registration and the differences between the two registrations.
What is the definition of merely descriptive? A mark is merely descriptive under
Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1), if it describes an ingredient,
quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the relevant goods
and/or services. In re Gyulay, 820 F.2d 1216, 3 USPQ2d 1009 (Fed. Cir. 1987); In
re Bed & Breakfast Registry, 791 F.2d 157, 229 USPQ 818 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re MetPath
Inc., 223 USPQ 88 (TTAB 1984); In re Bright-
According to the USPTO (see merely descriptive refusals): The two major reasons for
not protecting [allowing registration of] descriptive marks are: (1) to prevent
the owner of a mark from inhibiting competition in the sale of particular goods or
services; and (2) to avoid the possibility of costly infringement suits brought by
the registrant. This thus enables businesses and competitors to have the freedom
to use common descriptive language when merely describing their own goods or services
to the public in advertising and marketing materials. In re Abcor Development Corp.,
588 F.2d 811, 200 USPQ 215 (C.C.P.A. 1978); In re Colonial Stores, Inc., 394 F.2d
549, 157 USPQ 382, 383 (C.C.P.A. 1968); Armour & Co. v. Organon Inc., 245 F.2d 495,
114 USPQ 334, 337 (C.C.P.A. 1957); In re Styleclick.com Inc., 58 USPQ2d 1523, 1526-
Is there anything worse than being merely descriptive? Being Generic.
Generic terms are terms that the relevant purchasing public understands primarily
as the common or class name for the goods or services. In re Dial-
Can my unregistered mark be merely descriptive or generic?
Yes, and it may make enforcement difficult. Federal trademark infringement, 15 U.S.C. S 1114, federal unfair competition, 15 U.S.C. S 1125(a)(1)(A), and trademark registration principles are based on the same principles. “To prove either form of Lanham Act violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) it has a valid and legally protectable mark; (2) it owns the mark; and (3) the defendant's use of the mark to identify goods or services causes a likelihood of confusion.” A&H Sportswear v. Victoria's Secret Stores, 237 F.3d at 210 (3rd Cir., 2000).
Claims for trademark infringement for registered or unregistered marks require findings
that the marks owned by plaintiff are either inherently distinctive [rather than
descriptive] or have acquired a secondary meaning and are likely to be confused with
defendants' marks by members of the relevant public. Duncan Mcintosh Co. v. Newport
Dunes Marina LLC, 324 F.Supp.2d 1083-
In addition to distinctiveness, to be a valid mark, a mark applying for registration must be a valid use and must actually function as a trademark.:
Not everything that a party adopts and uses with the intent that it function as a trademark necessarily achieves this goal or is legally capable of doing so, and not everything that is recognized or associated with a party is necessarily a registrable trademark. As the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals observed in In re Standard Oil Co., 275 F.2d 945, 947, 125 USPQ 227, 229 (C.C.P.A. 1960):
The Trademark Act is not an act to register words but to register trademarks. Before there can be registrability, there must be a trademark (or a service mark) and, unless words have been so used, they cannot qualify for registration. Words are not registrable merely because they do not happen to be descriptive of the goods or services with which they are associated.” Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) 1202.
Also, an unregistered mark must actually have been used as a trademark [is a valid mark and functions as a mark] to be protected under trademark law. "[A] plaintiff must show that it has actually used the designation at issue as a trademark"; thus the designation or phrase must be used to "perform[ ] the trademark function of identifying the source of the merchandise to the customers." Microstrategy Incorp. v. Motorola, 245 F.3d at 341 (4th Cir., 2001) quoting Rock & Roll Hall of Fame v. Gentile Prods., 134 F.3d 749, 753 (6th Cir. 1998). See Valid and Invalid Uses of Words, Number, Symbols, etc. as Trademarks.
Secondary meaning is when the consuming public has made a link between an alleged mark and the source of the mark.
The factors considered in determining whether a descriptive mark (not inherently distinctive) has achieved secondary meaning include:
(1) whether actual purchasers of the product bearing the claimed trademark associate the trademark with the producer as evidenced by survey or direct consumer testimony;
(2) the degree and manner of advertising under the claimed trademark;
(3) the length and manner of use of the claimed trademark; and
(4) whether use of the claimed trademark has been exclusive.
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc., 778 F.2d 1352, 1358 (9th Cir.1985).
Evidence of Secondary Meaning or Acquired Distinctiveness
Evidence of secondary meaning or acquired distinctiveness may include specific dollar
sales under the mark, advertising figures, samples of advertising, consumer or dealer
statements of recognition of the mark as a source identifier, affidavits, and any
other evidence that establishes the distinctiveness of the mark as an indicator of
source. See 37 C.F.R. §2.41(a); In re Ideal Indus., Inc., 508 F.2d 1336, 184 USPQ
487 (C.C.P.A. 1975); In re Instant Transactions Corp., 201 USPQ 957 (TTAB 1979);
TMEP §§1212.06 et seq. The United States Patent and Trademark Office decides each
case on its own merits-
How can you Avoid Descriptive Trademarks?
Plan for a Strong Trademark Registration (not a filled in form!)
To verify a potential trademark is: NOT MERELY DESCRIPTIVE, is strong, is available to use, and is ready to register, the process should be more than a direct hit federal search. To maximize the commercial strength and minimize the weaknesses of a trademark, we start with these five steps:
1) Verify Inherent Strength (this avoids merely descriptive, geographically descriptive and other office actions),
2) Verify Right to Use, (this avoids likelihood of confusion refusal office actions and others)
3) Verify Right to Register, (this avoids many types of refusals including merely descriptive, deceptively misdescriptive, geographically descriptive and others that can often be predicted)
4) Verify the potential mark (as currently used) Functions As A Mark, and (this avoids specimens refusals, trade name refusals, and others. The USPTO is looking for valid use not just any use of words or business names.)
5) Verify that the Goods and Services ID is both the correct and the maximum claim that are user can make and verify that the Goods and Services ID meets USPTO requirements before filing. (This avoids office actions to correct incorrect IDs which can slow down a registration. Incorrect IDs may be corrected during the prosecution of a trademark if they do not materially alter the mark or the ID. Correcting problems before application saves time and money. Filing in a new class after an application has been submitted to cure a problem ID is the same price as a new application in that class.)
*We don’t stop here but this is a good start!
For more information from Not Just Patents, see our other sites: